For example, most spell checkers include options to customize the dictionary to include proper nouns and acronyms. "It is well settled that a trial court must instruct sea sponge on any defense, including a mistake of fact defense."Īs one would expect, the attorney's error, while certainly entertaining to the rest of us, drastically weakened his credibility in the eyes of the court and made him the butt of many of his colleagues' jokes.Īlthough spell checkers are fairly straight forward and user-friendly, they are only as good as the writer's ability to use them. "An appropriate instruction limiting the judge's criminal liability in such a prosecution must be given sea sponge explaining that certain acts or omissions by themselves are not sufficient to support a conviction." This lead to some very embarrassing sentences, such as: According to the story, an attorney inadvertently replaced the words "sua sponte" (a Latin phrase for "on its motion") with the words "sea sponge" throughout his brief. Zar The lawyer and the sea spongeĪlong these same lines, there is an amusing story that has circulated in the legal community regarding the dangers of spell check. It nose bee fore two long and eye can put the error rite. It shows me strait a weigh as soon as a mist ache is maid. It plainly marks four my revue miss steaks eye kin knot sea.Įye strike a quay and type a word and weight for it to say The limitation of traditional spell checkers is epitomized by the often quoted poem, " Ode to the Spell Checker." Spell check does not always offer useful spelling suggestions for severely misspelled words.įor example, the following are some commonly misused words that standard spellcheckers will not catch:.Spell check may flag words as errors which are indeed correct. Spell check will not detect the improper use of homonyms, such as "their" and "there.".Spell check cannot help you with some proper names, such as "Heston" or "Jolie.".Spell check should be your first step in editing your document, not the only step! The problems with trusting spell checkīelow are just some of the dangers of relying on spell check: However, writers should be cautioned from relying on it to catch every error. That being said, a spell checker is a handy tool and, therefore, should not be completely abandoned. This is because spell checkers can only detect if words are spelled correctly, not if they are used correctly. "Spell check will not fined words witch are miss used butt spelled rite!"Īn ordinary spell checker will find few or no errors in the above sentence. However, writers should be wary of the dangers of relying too heavily on these tools. Almost all word processing programs come equipped with a tool for checking both spelling and grammar.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |